Practical proposed steps for North West Leicestershire.
The stages explain what should happen first. They are not promised completion dates. Funding, powers and ongoing costs need to be established before a proposal is adopted.
Proposal
Build on completed transport training
Eight drivers have passed the licensing process through the partnership.
Proposed response: Assess whether the route helps meet local transport needs.
Evidence
Who could lead: North West Leicestershire District Council with the named delivery partners.
- Short term
Publish training and licensing requirements.
- Medium term
Monitor successful applicants and safe service provision.
- Long term
Review local availability with operators and users.
How to judge progress
Starting point: Private-hire driver training partnership: Eight drivers licensed
Measure: Licensed drivers working locally and service availability.
Trade-off: More licences do not automatically mean more accessible vehicles.
Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.
Private-hire driver training partnership →
Proposal
Keep waste advice aligned with the delayed start
Bin and vehicle problems have moved the first phase into early 2027.
Proposed response: Give each household a confirmed change date only when delivery is ready.
Evidence
Who could lead: North West Leicestershire District Council with the named delivery partners.
- Short term
Correct old November-start notices.
- Medium term
Confirm vehicles, bins and assisted-collection arrangements.
- Long term
Review missed collections during the transition.
How to judge progress
Starting point: Waste and food-recycling collection change: Delayed; early-2027 first phase forecast
Measure: Confirmed households switched and missed-collection rates.
Trade-off: Premature instructions can lead to waste being presented incorrectly.
Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.
Waste and food-recycling collection change →
Proposal
Provide secure homes on a reused site
Measham’s former sheltered-housing site is being redeveloped for six council homes.
Proposed response: Check accessibility and energy performance at handover.
Evidence
Who could lead: North West Leicestershire District Council with the named delivery partners.
- Short term
Publish home types and allocation arrangements.
- Medium term
Verify completion and resolve defects.
- Long term
Review occupancy and actual running costs.
How to judge progress
Starting point: Queen’s Street council homes: Construction starting; late-summer 2027 target
Measure: Homes completed and occupied, with defects resolved.
Trade-off: Construction progress is not the same as available housing.
Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.
Queen’s Street council homes →
Proposal
Plan around supply-chain uncertainty
The waste rollout is delayed by bins and food-waste vehicles.
Proposed response: Make readiness checks part of the revised programme.
Evidence
Who could lead: North West Leicestershire District Council with the named delivery partners.
- Short term
Publish outstanding equipment dependencies.
- Medium term
Test routes and staffing before expanding rollout.
- Long term
Review reliability before the next area changes.
How to judge progress
Starting point: Waste and food-recycling collection change: Delayed; early-2027 first phase forecast
Measure: Equipment delivered and stable collections by phase.
Trade-off: A slower rollout delays benefits but can reduce service failures.
Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.
Waste and food-recycling collection change →
Proposal
Make room for homes people can afford
Average private rent is £914 a month (August 2026) in North West Leicestershire council area. This is £545 lower than the England average for the same month. Homes rented privately ranged from 4.9% in Broom Leys to 27.8% in Daleacre Hill — a gap of 22.9 percentage points.
Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.
Who could lead: The housing and planning authorities, housing associations and developers.
- Start now
Publish the local waiting list, temporary accommodation and affordable-home delivery figures together. Start by checking the different needs in Daleacre Hill and Broom Leys; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.
- Over the next few years
Test proposed housing sites against affordable-home need, access to work, school places and water capacity.
- Over the longer term
Check whether completed homes reduce unmet need, rather than counting planning permissions as delivery.
How to judge progress
Starting point: Average private rent is £914 a month (August 2026) in North West Leicestershire council area. Homes rented privately ranged from 4.9% in Broom Leys to 27.8% in Daleacre Hill — a gap of 22.9 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 38 of 38 current wards have comparable figures.
Measure: Affordable homes completed, households waiting, time in temporary accommodation, and rent compared with local earnings.
Trade-off: More homes can put pressure on infrastructure and land. Affordability requirements also affect development viability.
Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.
Evidence: Average monthly rent →
Evidence: Average home price →
Queen’s Street council homes →
Proposal
Plan homes and care around an older population
20.1% of people in North West Leicestershire council area were aged 65 or over (21 March 2021). People aged 65 or over ranged from 11% in Bardon to 32.4% in Broom Leys — a gap of 21.4 percentage points.
Age alone does not mean poor health or a need for care. Accessible homes, reliable transport and support close to home matter as people get older.
Who could lead: Adult social care, local health services, housing providers and transport authorities.
- Start now
Compare the location of older residents with access to care, shops and transport. Start by checking the different needs in Broom Leys and Bardon; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.
- Over the next few years
Prioritise home adaptations and care capacity in places with the clearest unmet need.
- Over the longer term
Build accessible homes and joined-up care into local development plans.
How to judge progress
Starting point: 20.1% aged 65 or over; 21 March 2021. People aged 65 or over ranged from 11% in Bardon to 32.4% in Broom Leys — a gap of 21.4 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 38 of 38 current wards have comparable figures.
Measure: Waits for home adaptations and care, avoidable hospital stays, and accessible homes delivered.
Trade-off: Services need skilled staff and ongoing funding. Age profiles alone cannot measure unmet care need.
Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.
Evidence: People aged 65 or over →
Proposal
Bring support closer to people in poor health
4.8% of people reported bad or very bad health in North West Leicestershire council area (21 March 2021). Across England, the figure was 5.2%. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 2.8% in Appleby to 7.8% in Greenhill — a gap of 5.1 percentage points.
This is how residents described their health in the census. It can reveal differences between neighbourhoods, but does not diagnose illness or measure current waiting times. Age profiles differ between places, so these shares do not measure service quality.
Who could lead: Local health services, public health teams, employers and community organisations.
- Start now
Use neighbourhood evidence to find where poor health and barriers to services overlap. Start by checking the different needs in Greenhill and Appleby; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.
- Over the next few years
Test accessible local support and publish who is reached and who is missed.
- Over the longer term
Review whether health gaps narrow, alongside housing and employment improvements.
How to judge progress
Starting point: 4.8% reporting bad or very bad health; 21 March 2021. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 2.8% in Appleby to 7.8% in Greenhill — a gap of 5.1 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 38 of 38 current wards have comparable figures.
Measure: Access to services and the health gap between neighbourhoods, using comparable age-adjusted measures when available.
Trade-off: A census snapshot is dated. New service decisions also need current needs assessments and residents’ experience.
Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.
Evidence: People reporting bad or very bad health →
Proposal
Connect local skills to local opportunities
30% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or equivalent (21 March 2021) in North West Leicestershire council area. Across England, the figure was 33.9%. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 10.3% in Ashby Castle to 28% in Coalville West — a gap of 17.7 percentage points.
Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.
Who could lead: Employers, colleges, universities and the relevant skills authority.
- Start now
Compare vacancies and employer needs with training available to local residents. Start by checking the different needs in Coalville West and Ashby Castle; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.
- Over the next few years
Link training to real jobs, including routes for people without formal qualifications.
- Over the longer term
Track sustained employment and earnings after training, not just course starts.
How to judge progress
Starting point: 30% with a degree or equivalent; 21 March 2021. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 10.3% in Ashby Castle to 28% in Coalville West — a gap of 17.7 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 38 of 38 current wards have comparable figures.
Measure: Sustained jobs, earnings and training completion for residents who face barriers to work.
Trade-off: Training takes time and cannot create demand for jobs on its own. Qualifications are not a complete measure of ability.
Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.
Evidence: People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent →
Evidence: People aged 16+ with no qualifications →
Private-hire driver training partnership →
Proposal
Target safety work where problems repeat
Mapped police records are available for neighbourhoods in North West Leicestershire council area.
Published locations are approximate and some crimes are not mapped. Counts show recorded incidents, not the chance of an individual becoming a victim.
Who could lead: The local police force, council community safety team and relevant services.
- Start now
Check recurring places and categories alongside local police priorities and residents’ reports.
- Over the next few years
Test focused prevention and support, with a comparison period agreed before the work starts.
- Over the longer term
Publish whether problems fall, move elsewhere or return, and adjust the response.
How to judge progress
Crime evidence and coverage →
Starting point: Use the dated, complete periods shown in Crime and safety; keep anti-social behaviour separate.
Measure: Comparable recorded incidents, repeat victimisation and residents’ reported experience; never a single crude league table.
Trade-off: More reporting can increase recorded crime. Enforcement and support may work differently for different problems.
Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.
Proposal
Turn published plans into visible progress
3 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.
A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.
Who could lead: The named project owners and council scrutiny bodies.
- Start now
Put the scope, owner, funding position and next milestone in one public place.
- Over the next few years
Report delivery against the agreed scope and explain delays or changes.
- Over the longer term
Check the benefits residents actually receive after completion.
How to judge progress
Starting point: The dated stages in Projects; unknown costs and funding remain unknown.
Measure: Milestones met, costs against the approved budget, and measured outcomes after delivery.
Trade-off: Delivery reporting takes staff time, but a launch announcement alone cannot show value for money.
Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.
Queen’s Street council homes →
Waste and food-recycling collection change →
Private-hire driver training partnership →
Proposal
Target support where disadvantages overlap
Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 8.2% in Castle Donington Central to 27% in Greenhill — a gap of 18.8 percentage points.
These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.
Who could lead: The council's housing, public health and employment teams, with local services.
- Start now
Check current advice and support access in Greenhill, using the census pattern as a starting point and asking residents what is missing.
- Over the next few years
Test joined-up housing, work and health support, and publish who takes part, who cannot reach it and what changes.
- Over the longer term
Track sustained outcomes and whether gaps between neighbourhoods narrow, using comparable dates and measures.
How to judge progress
Starting point: Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 8.2% in Castle Donington Central to 27% in Greenhill — a gap of 18.8 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 38 of 38 wards.
Measure: Access to support, unresolved housing problems and sustained work or health outcomes. Census percentages alone cannot measure a new programme's success.
Trade-off: Targeting neighbourhoods can miss people in need elsewhere. Avoid labelling every resident by the average for their ward.
Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.
Evidence: Households facing two or more measured disadvantages →
Queen’s Street council homes →
